MedQuist
Clams Up Company fails to Respond to Questions; New SEC filings
Indicate Stock Listing in Jeopardy The Asheville
Tribune and I apparently have been put on a "do not contact"
list following last week’s disclosures regarding
possible outsourcing of Veterans Administration medical
transcriptions to a company in India. MedQuist, a
NASDAQ listed company in New Jersey that is 71 percent owned by the
Dutch company Royal Phillips, closed its Asheville office last week
and laid off the system administrator who had accused them of
outsourcing Veteran’s Administration medical records
overseas. On March 24 the company announced it would
fail to meet the Security and Exchange Commission’s extended
deadline of March 30 for filing its Annual Report on the required
10K form. On March 31 the NASDAQ responded with notification to
MedQuist that they would be de-listed from the exchange on April 8
unless they filed an appeal. Also, MedQuist’s trading symbol was
changed from MEDQ to MEDQE to indicate their out-of-compliance
status. MedQuist promptly filed the appeal and issued
proper notification with an SEC 8K report. The appeal provides
MedQuist up to six weeks of additional time to prepare the 10K or to
explain why they cannot provide financial statements. If they are
de-listed due to a lack of financial information they would also be
excluded from trading in the Over The Counter (OTC) market. None of this has been picked up in the
mainstream media. But many other worms in the medical transcription
can have come to light. David Lazarus, columnist for
the San Francisco Chronicle, independently came up with other examples of questionable outsourcing of medical
transcriptions to companies in Pakistan and the Philippines. A
Website http://www.privacyforvets.com/
had 30,000 hits after The Asheville Tribune posted the story
on its Website, http://www.ashevilletribune.com/;
and I had whistle blower Susan Purdue on my Sunday afternoon talk
show on WWNC-AM 570. She also appeared on the Web-based morning
radio program, http://www.thepowerhour.com/
hosted by Joyce Riley. While working on that story
we spoke with a public relations representative at Ruder Finn, Inc.,
the agency representing MedQuist. The young lady obtained two
denials from the firm in short order and we included them in the
story.
But when we got back to her with follow-up
questions we received no reply. The nature of our
questions may be considered provocative but the company’s denials
were issued in the present tense. There was no statement denying
that what Purdue alleged happened was untrue. For the record, here
are some of the questions MedQuist won’t answer:
Are you
aware of the allegations (Susan Purdue) has made regarding
outsourcing medical transcription overseas? MedQuist’s
Web site says there are 10,000 US/based MedQuist
transcriptionists. Are there any who do MedQuist work
overseas?
If so, did any work for MedQuist on VA medical
records? If so, how do you guarantee confidentiality of the data? If
so, How do you comply with HIPPA regulations? Does
MedQuist have transcribers in India? Pakistan? Have you
ever? When? If in the past but not now, when were they discontinued?
Have military transcriptions been outsourced overseas? Do you think
it is a security risk to outsource to transcribers in those
countries?
What impact could overseas outsourcing of military
records have on your relationship to government agencies such as the
Veterans Administration or other medical
organizations? What specific allegations of improper
billing have been brought to the board’s
attention? Would this include the possibility of federal charges of
"procurement fraud" due to excessive profit margins due to overseas
transcriptions under federal contracts? Has MedQuist
been investigated by the FBI or any other regulatory or criminal
agency regarding these allegations? Was the company’s
decision to delay release of the 10-K annual report prompted by
concerns over possible criminal liability under
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002? Finally, it is our
understanding that Susan Purdue has invested her life savings in
defending herself during her testimony on legal fees. If the
company’s Board of Directors internal audit substantiates Susan
Purdue’s charges, will she be compensated for bringing the problems
to management’s attention? But those weren’t the best
questions. I saved them for last:
Questions for Gregory M. Sebasky, new MedQuist
President and CEO: Are any MedQuist loans, notes or other financial
instruments dependant upon maintaining listing on the NASDAQ, or
being able to be traded in the OTC market? Please provide a list of
insider trading since the date of Susan Purdue's e-mail notifying
management she had contacted the FBI, on Sept. 16, 2002. This list
should cover all current and former corporate executives and
those considered by the SEC to qualify as
"insiders." A company’s refusal to answer questions
doesn’t necessarily imply guilt. But the normal reaction would be to
simply call back, or e-mail, to politely refuse further comment.
Writers and talk show hosts can live with that. But MedQuist’s
abrupt termination of communications is unprofessional and reflects
poorly on their management. By the way, I stated "new
CEO." MedQuist has had four of them in the past 18 months, roughly
since Purdue went to the FBI with her story.
We’ll keep
an eye on the situation.
This
story filed for the Tribune by Bill
Fishburn.
Comments to tribuneeditor@bellsouth.net
| |